random musings

Month

March 2011

48 posts

Spotify Is Coming to the US! → techcrunch.com

Mar 31, 20111 note
#random #music #streaming #tech
Mar 31, 2011
#random #tech #Google #+1 #social networking
Mar 30, 2011285 notes
#advertising #ocean #panda #random #wwf #blue fin tuna
Mar 30, 2011
#random #photo #snow #winter #Black and White
Mar 29, 2011
Mar 28, 201114 notes
Marc Jacobs Intern Calls CEO a “Tyrant” in Twitter Meltdown → mashable.com

I laughed a little at this…

Mar 28, 2011
#random #fail #lol #fashion #twitter #mashable #marc jacobs #intern
This could save your life → learnyourdamnhomophones.com
Mar 28, 2011
#random #lol #blog #blogging #language
Mar 28, 2011
#random #photo #apple #tech #spam #fail #lol
Question:

Why is it so difficult to study a subject that you have no desire to learn about or will ever see again in the near future?

Is there a way to trick your mind into thinking it’s not so bad?

Mar 28, 20111 note
#random #education #science #psychology
Listen

It’s Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday, Friday!

Mar 25, 2011
#random #music #remix
The Age of Mediocrity: Why Rebecca Black Is Everyone’s Fault [OPINION] → mashable.com

This post is obviously not mine but that of Mashable.com and Peter Shankman. This was too good to pass up and not reblog, and now I share it with you, enjoy.

This post reflects the opinions of the author and not necessarily those of Mashable as a publication.

Peter Shankman is the founder of HARO and is generally regarded as one of the top social media consultants and marketing speakers working today. His clients include Saudi Aramco, NASA, The U.S. Government, Haworth, Disney, Foley Hoag LLP, American Express, and countless others. He blogs at shankman.com.

There’s a young woman — perhaps you’ve heard of her — currently climbing the YouTube charts with a song about the days of the week, specifically, “Friday.” There’s also another song on YouTube rocketing to the top with a bullet, this one about a pair of jeans.

When I was a kid, we listened to songs about days of the week and clothing, and it was called Sesame Street, not “mainstream entertainment.”

Welcome to the age of mediocrity, where anyone with a computer, a video camera, and a few thousand dollars for production can be considered the next big thing.

But as sad as that is, what does it say about us as a society?

Analyzing “Friday,” it’s not so much that Rebecca Black can’t sing. She’s about on par with some other pop stars, and — let’s face it — they’re not remaking The Marriage of Figaro here. The problem is the mundane, almost soul crushing lyrics, recounting a day in the life of someone we care nothing about.

Essentially, Ms. Black has become the musical version of a bad Twitter user, offering very little substance and value, but still feeling the need to overshare.

Ms. Black’s story, as it’s been told, involves her parents giving her a produced single as a “gift,” and depending on who you ask, the rapid ascent of her YouTube video is due either to morbid curiosity, or media attention brought on by morbid curiosity. It’s certainly not brought on by talent.

We used to be a society of content eaters fed by a very small kitchen run by music labels, TV stations, and movie stars. With the advent of the Internet, Flip cameras, and yes, even Justin Bieber, the paradigm has shifted. It’s no longer a world where the talent wins. It’s not even a world where the beauty wins. It’s a world where anyone can post, and in many cases, the worse the performance, the better it does. Call it the “William Hung” Effect.

With the power to broadcast comes great responsibility. And when people don’t take responsibility, and create videos about days of the week, we can’t be shocked and scream about the downfall of society. We’ve taken a typical 13-year-old teenager and given her parents an enormous return on their paltry investment. We did this. We have no one to blame but ourselves.

So that begs the question: How does someone get there? How does a talentless nobody wind up with 43 million YouTube views in a few weeks?

Step one: Content. A catchy autotune, a baby laughing, a cat being tickled. It doesn’t matter.

Step two: Send it out as the latest OMG thing in the world. Get a few views a minute. Let it grow, unchecked, like a fungus.

Here’s an example. After fighting with someone for six months while training for an Ironman, I simply took our words and put them into an Extranormal movie. The result? Over 750,000 views in a week. It’s not hard. I did it for fun, and it cost me nothing.

Media? Well, the media plays a part, no doubt. Five thousand views in a minute does a story make. So one media outlet covers it — perhaps for how bad, boring, and just plain ordinary it is — and perpetuates the cycle by including a link to the offending video.

Does that make it our fault? Absolutely. We’re a society that likes destruction. We like Sheen. We like Lohan. We like Jerry Springer. We like Maury. We’ve embraced mediocrity because we need some level of proof that we’re better than that — that we’re not the worst things out there. We’re not, because there’s Rebecca Black, with Friday, Friday, Friday!

She’s not the problem. We are.

The worst part? Perhaps it’s not a problem at all. Perhaps, if we didn’t have the Rebecca Blacks of the world to complain about, we’d be an even unhappier society. Perhaps we need people like Rebecca Black to balance our worldview, to take away the sadness of what’s going on in the news, and to distract us from our own mundane lives.

Perhaps we invented Rebecca Black, and others like her, because we simply had no other choice.

Mar 25, 20114 notes
#random #music #fail #lol #mashable #opinion #blog #rebecca black
Mar 24, 20117 notes
#random #photo #lol #music
Mar 17, 20111 note
#random #photo #lol
Mar 17, 2011
#photo #random #social media #tech #lol
Hotpot vs Yelp: The Battle Begins or Does It?

With the current trend of posting your whereabouts to your friends online, applications such as Gowalla, foursquare, facebook Places, Google Latitude, and many more that are available to you, Google Hotpot and Yelp are the two that stand out—to me.

What’s the Difference?

All of these apps allow for “check-ins” to spots on a map via geo-location. From their you can earn badges, pins, titles for checking in to a certain place the most, and various other miscellaneous virtual prizes to gloat to your friends about. The difference between Hotpot and Yelp is that these two services not only allow a user to check in, but they also offer the ability for the user to rate a place they were just at, and review said place. Recently, Yelp has started testing “Yelp Deals” (1-Day sales coupons for its users), something which Hotptot is not doing (yet).

Hotpot

Hotpot is what happens when Google Places and Google Latitude get married and have offspring. Latitude is a check-in service that shows your Google friends and various other social network friends where you are. You can ping them and have them check-in too, if they are nearby, and it [Latitude] can also show you where your friends are at via Google Maps. Places is a consumer’s guide to all things local and near. It allows you to rate and/or review that restaurant you were just at. Your friends will then know which restaurants they should go to and which ones they should avoid. It’s better to find out what type of place you’re about to go to from your friends who have similar tastes then to accept a random 4-star rating of a stranger who didn’t leave a review. Places is not limited to just restaurants, you can also rate and/or review parks, coffee shops, retail stores, and etc. If you own an Android phone guess what, it is already installed. There is no need to go to the Android Market and download. And, surprise surprise, Latitude is already installed on there too. These two applications, Places and Latitude work hand in hand. For example, let’s say that you’re in a new city and you want to find a restaurant to get something to eat, fire up Places, select restaurants, look at all of the available options, read the reviews, choose a spot, go their and check in with Latitude so your friends can see your where, and finally, open Places back up, and fire up Hotpot and leave a rating and a review of said restaurant and you’re done.

“Hotpot is really going places: to a Google search box near you and around the world. In addition to this, Hotpot will be also available in 38 new languages as well that includes French, German, Italian, Spanish, Russian, Chinese and Korean among others. Hotpot also comes seamless integration with Google Maps as well most especially the Google Maps on Android.”

-From Google’s official blog, Hotpot project manager Lior Ron

Watch this video created by Google to see a brief overview of how Hotpot works:

Yelp

Yelp may not have been the first online recommendation service available to people, but it was—and quite possibly still is—the best service available. The idea of Yelp is that it helps to promote local businesses by getting users to rate and review their experiences at these places. Yelp is centered around the community at large. A local business will register with Yelp and they can advertise if they so choose, and customers will do whatever it is that is offered at these places and rate and review them, and other “Yelpers” will then see this activity and decide whether or not they should venture out to these places themselves. If you have questions about any place listed in Yelp, one thing that you can do that you can’t with Hotpot, is have a conversation with the person who rated and reviewed a place. This type of interaction amongst Yelpers is (in my opinion) why Yelp got to be as big as they are today. About one year ago Yelp introduced check-ins. This is an incentives based type of offering. A Yelper will check-in to a business and—should the business be a willing participant—offer some type of reward for doing so. Even foursquare has a loyalty program for their “mayors”, this type of loyalty program is not yet available with Google Latitude or Hotpot—at least not to my knowledge, if they do have a program please let me know in the comments—but I wouldn’t be surprised that it’s not already in the works. For this loyalty program to work, a local business needs to register with Yelp—for free I might add—and setup advertising, converse with customers, review the trends within the community, and adjust their promotions and marketing accordingly.

Decisions, Decisions

With all of the choices available how do you pick one? I have been using everything mentioned above for quite some time now and it is difficult to say which one is the best. They all their strengths and they all have their weaknesses. With anything involving Google, you have a vast amount of information at your fingertips, all you have to do is enter a search query, hit enter, and a lot of information is returned to you. With Yelp, you signup, become a member of a large community that has the same ideas and thoughts as you, and the ratings and reviews appear to be more personal than Google.

Which service do you prefer?

Mar 14, 2011
#random #tech #google #hotpot #yelp
Mar 14, 20111,340 notes
#random #lol #blogging
What's new with Blogger? → googleblog.blogspot.com

It looks like Google has been up to something…

Should you not have enough time to read the whole post, you can just watch this video that they so kindly created:

Mar 14, 2011
#random #Google #Blogger #Blogging
When zombies attack!: Mathematical modelling of an outbreak of zombie infection. [pdf] → mysite.science.uottawa.ca

scipsy:

A research paper published in ‘Infection disease modelling research progress’, this is the abstract:

Zombies are a popular figure in pop culture/entertainment and they are usually portrayed as being brought about through an outbreak or epidemic. Consequently, we model a zombie attack, using biological assumptions based on popular zombie movies. We introduce a basic model for zombie infection, determine equilibria and their stability, and illustrate the outcome with numerical solutions. We then refine the model to introduce a latent period of zombification, whereby humans are infected, but not infectious, before becoming undead. We then modify the model to include the effects of possible quarantine or a cure. Finally, we examine the impact of regular, impulsive reductions in the number of zombies and derive conditions under which eradication can occur. We show that only quick, aggressive attacks can stave off the doomsday scenario: the collapse of society as zombies overtake us all. […]

Mar 14, 201161 notes
#disease #math #sci-fi #zombie #infection
Mar 14, 20111 note
#random #photo
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January
  • February
  • March 1
  • April
  • May 7
  • June 11
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 1
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May 1
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012
  • January
  • February
  • March 48
  • April 23
  • May 15
  • June 13
  • July 25
  • August 9
  • September 19
  • October 23
  • November 13
  • December 19